Every leader aims to build a team that consistently delivers exceptional results, especially in highly competitive sectors like SaaS and sales. However, balancing diverse talents within the team can be challenging. High-performing individuals, or "A-players," often carry the heaviest load, innovating, problem-solving, and setting the standard for success. But when low-performing individuals are part of the team, they can drag down productivity, morale, and momentum, potentially causing even the A-players to disengage. Codie Sanchez, founder and CEO of Contrarian Thinking, a financial advice enterprise with over 2.5+ million subscribers, gives insights into the dynamics of "B" and "C" players and highlights the impact these individuals have on high performers and explains why leaders must actively manage team composition and performance standards.

 

Understanding A-Players and Their Drive for Excellence

A-players are self-motivated, resilient, and proactive. They thrive in environments where excellence is valued, and their success often inspires others to raise their standards. However, their productivity and morale are highly sensitive to the performance of those around them. A-players need a workplace where everyone contributes and adds value, or they may begin to feel burdened by compensating for less effective team members.

The presence of low-performing individuals – "C-players" – can disrupt this dynamic. These individuals may lack commitment, struggle with productivity, or consistently underperform, requiring more guidance and management than their contributions justify. Over time, this misalignment can dilute the team's overall productivity and create a negative experience for A-players.

 

How Low-Performing Individuals Affect A-Players

Low-performing team members impact A-players in several specific ways:

Increased Workload and Resentment

When low performers are unable to deliver on their responsibilities, high-performing team members frequently pick up the slack. Over time, this extra work can result in burnout, frustration, and resentment toward both the low performer and management for not addressing the issue. Codie Sanchez notes that inaction can result in the A-players' productivity waning as they're forced to invest their time and energy in non-value-adding tasks.

Lowered Standards and Compromised Morale

If C-players consistently get away with poor performance or lack of accountability, the standard of work within the team can start to slip. A-players are accustomed to pushing themselves and taking ownership, so seeing different expectations for low performers can be demoralising. This disparity can lead A-players to question the company's commitment to excellence and fairness, affecting their motivation.

Negative Influence on Culture and Engagement

Team culture is highly susceptible to the behaviours and attitudes of its members. Low performers often lack the enthusiasm and drive that characterise a positive, achievement-oriented culture. As a result, their presence can create a ripple effect, lowering engagement among the team and impacting the sense of camaraderie. A-players, who often draw motivation from a competitive but collaborative culture, may disengage if they feel isolated in their efforts to perform.

Reduced Opportunities for Development and Innovation

A-players often thrive on challenges and opportunities for growth. However, when they're preoccupied with compensating for low performers, they lose valuable time that could otherwise be spent on strategic initiatives, upskilling, or innovating. By focusing their energy on supporting underperformers, they may miss out on opportunities to advance or take on high-impact projects, limiting their professional growth and leading to job dissatisfaction.

Talent Drain: Retaining A-Players Becomes Difficult

Over time, high performers who feel that their contributions are undervalued or their workload is unsustainable may look for opportunities elsewhere. Talent retention is a significant concern, particularly when A-players feel the team's structure hinders their success. Companies risk losing top talent if they fail to address the impact of low performers.

Codie Sanchez's Insights on B-Players: A Balanced Perspective

Codie Sanchez highlights the value of "B-players" in contrast to both high-performing A-players and low-performing C-players. She argues that B-players are often reliable, consistent, and have a stabilising influence. While they may not be as high-impact as A-players, they reliably perform their roles, contributing to a solid team foundation without the risks associated with low performers.

Sanchez's insights highlight the importance of having a balanced team, where B-players complement A-players by handling essential tasks that may not require extraordinary effort but are crucial for the team's functioning. Unlike C-players, B-players add value without pulling down the performance of their teammates.

 

Strategies for Leaders to Mitigate the Impact of Low Performers

Set and Enforce Clear Performance Expectations

Creating a culture of accountability begins with setting clear expectations for every team member. High performers should not feel that they alone bear the responsibility for delivering results. By holding C-players to the same standards, leaders can demonstrate that everyone is accountable and that underperformance has consequences.

Use Performance Reviews to Address and Support Improvement

Regular performance reviews and check-ins are essential for identifying and addressing underperformance. Leaders should offer support, training, or coaching to help low performers improve. However, if improvement remains elusive, it's important to re-evaluate the individual's fit within the team.

Leverage B-Players for Team Stability

As Codie Sanchez suggests, not every team member has to be an A-player to add value. B-players can support A-players by taking on foundational tasks and maintaining a steady level of productivity. Recognising and rewarding B-players' contributions can foster a more balanced team dynamic, allowing A-players to focus on higher-impact tasks.

Encourage a Culture of Continuous Feedback

A culture of open feedback enables teams to address issues as they arise rather than letting them escalate. Leaders can encourage A-players to share their insights and experiences with management, helping identify when low performance affects productivity. When low performers are made aware of their impact on others, it can prompt improvement or a re-evaluation of their role.

Prioritise Team Composition and Hiring

To prevent performance disparities, leaders should carefully consider team composition during hiring. Incorporating high performers and reliable B-players while avoiding consistent low performers can create a dynamic and balanced team. By building a team where members complement each other's strengths, leaders can create an environment where A-players feel supported and motivated.

 

Final Takeaways

Protecting the Productivity of A-Players

The impact of low-performing individuals on A-players cannot be overstated. Leaders who fail to address underperformance risk creating a cycle of frustration and disengagement that can drain talent and weaken team culture. By setting clear expectations, fostering a culture of accountability, and balancing the team with high performers and reliable B-players, leaders can protect the productivity and morale of their top talent.

Codie Sanchez's perspective on B-players is a reminder that success in any team relies on more than just star performers. B-players offer stability and consistency, while A-players drive innovation and growth. Ensuring that both are adequately supported – and that low-performing C-players are either coached up or out – is essential for creating a productive, positive, high-performing work environment. For leaders, this balance is key to maintaining A-players' engagement and satisfaction and crucial for long-term team success.

Want to hire more A players? Arrange a consultation with one of our experts.